fbpx

Landfill plan along Great Lakes sparks fear of pollution

Landfill plan along Great Lakes sparks fear of pollution
March 13, 2018 Great Lakes Today
Photo courtesy of Morgan Springer via greatlakestoday.org

This story originally appeared on Great Lakes Today and is republished here with permission. 

By Morgan Springer • Mar 12, 2018

In northern Michigan, people who live near a landfill have been dealing with contaminated drinking water for decades. A new plan for the landfill makes them even more concerned.

Rita McNamara remembers that she found out about the contamination when her well broke, and she started planning for a new one.

She was walking her property with a well driller when a woman from the county health department drove up.

McNamara recalls: “And she had a clipboard in her hand and she said, ‘Woah, woah, woah, woah, woah. You can’t just drill a regular well here.’

“And she said, ‘Yeah, you are in a restriction zone. You’re in a risk zone.’ And I said, ‘Well that’s the first time that I’ve heard about it.’”

This risk zone is big. It stretches from a landfill that’s more than 100 acres, and it covers dozens of houses.

Decades ago, industrial waste dumped at the site south of Traverse City contaminated drinking water.

The latest controversy involves leachate – a liquid byproduct of landfills. State officials say if the salty liquid leaked, it would make water undrinkable.

A company called American Waste took over the Wexford County landfill in recent years. It wants to inject the leachate underground instead of trucking it away as waste.

“They can only be injected into deep formations that are isolated from freshwater,” says Hal Fitch of Michigan’s Department of Environmental Quality. It’s one of the agencies that will decide if American Waste can inject the leachate underground.

He says that would be about 2,000 feet below the freshwater people drink.

“And in between that freshwater zone and the proposed injection zone are multiple layers of very low permeability rock,” Fitch says.

There are nearly 1,400 active injection wells in Michigan right now, he says. Most are for oil and gas byproducts.

And, he notes, Michigan has a long history of safe injection wells with no cases of contaminated drinking water.

American Waste declined to comment for this story. A representative has told officials the well would follow safety requirements.

But residents still worry about the company’s plan.

So does Christopher Grobbel, an environmental consultant in Michigan.

“There have been numerous violations and releases including at the Hoskins Manufacturing deep injection well in Mio, Enviro Geotechnologies well in Romulus,” he says. “So there have been problems in Michigan.”

Grobbel says there might not be evidence of groundwater contamination, but there was evidence of soil impact. And injection wells have contaminated drinking water in Florida and in Texas, he says.

Local municipalities around the Wexford County landfill have also come out against the proposed injection well.

Mike Shriberg, who runs National Wildlife Federation’s Great Lakes Regional Office, says landfill contamination issues seem to be increasingly common.

“While fresh water may be abundant in this region because of the Great Lakes, we have areas where safe drinking water and clean water is not assured,” he says.

He says there is a range of problems with drinking water – from lead contamination in Flint, Mich., to algae blooms in western Lake Erie. There’s also runoff from industry and military bases.

Fitch says his agency cares about public input, but ultimately, the state will follow the law.

“So if that well meets all the regulations and the company, the applicant can demonstrate that it has all the necessary safeguards, then they qualify for a permit,” he says. “And that’s what our decision has to be based on.”

A public hearing on American Waste’s plan is expected in the next few months. Then, state and federal agencies will make a decision on the injection well.

0 Comments

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*